Polynym Math

set comparison between two polynyms

PResearch Principles ⊥ Pprecept


Equality

$$A \neq B$$
A is not equal to B

Subset

$$A \not\subseteq B$$
A is not a subset of or equal to B

Superset

$$A \not\supseteq B$$
A is not a superset of or equal to B

Intersection

$$A \cap B =$$
{ }

Union

$$A \cup B =$$
{ Correlation isn’t causation, Extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence, Falsifiablity, Occam’s Razor, Replicability, Rule out rival hypotheses, to not commit adultery, to not intoxicate, to not kill, to not lie, to not steal }

Symmetric Difference

$$A \ominus B =$$
{ Correlation isn’t causation, Extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence, Falsifiablity, Occam’s Razor, Replicability, Rule out rival hypotheses, to not commit adultery, to not intoxicate, to not kill, to not lie, to not steal }

Difference

$$A - B =$$
{ Correlation isn’t causation, Extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence, Falsifiablity, Occam’s Razor, Replicability, Rule out rival hypotheses }

Difference

$$B - A =$$
{ to not commit adultery, to not intoxicate, to not kill, to not lie, to not steal }

Cartesian Product

$$A \times B =$$
{ (Correlation isn’t causation, to not commit adultery),
(Correlation isn’t causation, to not intoxicate),
(Correlation isn’t causation, to not kill),
(Correlation isn’t causation, to not lie),
(Correlation isn’t causation, to not steal),
(Extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence, to not commit adultery),
(Extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence, to not intoxicate),
(Extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence, to not kill),
(Extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence, to not lie),
(Extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence, to not steal),
(Falsifiablity, to not commit adultery),
(Falsifiablity, to not intoxicate),
(Falsifiablity, to not kill),
(Falsifiablity, to not lie),
(Falsifiablity, to not steal),
(Occam’s Razor, to not commit adultery),
(Occam’s Razor, to not intoxicate),
(Occam’s Razor, to not kill),
(Occam’s Razor, to not lie),
(Occam’s Razor, to not steal),
(Replicability, to not commit adultery),
(Replicability, to not intoxicate),
(Replicability, to not kill),
(Replicability, to not lie),
(Replicability, to not steal),
(Rule out rival hypotheses, to not commit adultery),
(Rule out rival hypotheses, to not intoxicate),
(Rule out rival hypotheses, to not kill),
(Rule out rival hypotheses, to not lie),
(Rule out rival hypotheses, to not steal) }

Research Principles

Source
Varun Does Research
Area
Scientific Research
Mode
part
Depth
6
User
dane


vs.

precept

Area
Theology
Mode
type
Depth
5
User
scotty
6 parts of Research Principles

5 types of precept
Rule out rival hypotheses
Correlation isn’t causation
Falsifiablity
Replicability
Extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence
Occam’s Razor

to not kill
to not steal
to not commit adultery
to not lie
to not intoxicate
© 2026 Nymology