When arguing temptation, the word consequence askes why the word lead is a mystery but, the word pleasure will state how the word trespass is logic.
When arguing aggregate, the word constituent askes why the word multiply is a mystery but, the word total will state how the word divide is logic.

Judging temptation involves how a state of consequence affects the ability to lead and to trespass. If all goes well, you'll achieve pleasure.
Judging aggregate involves how a state of constituent affects the ability to multiply and to divide. If all goes well, you'll achieve total.

When arguing q1n, the word q1s askes why the word q1e is a mystery but, the word q1o will state how the word q1r is logic.
When arguing q1n, the word q1s askes why the word q1e is a mystery but, the word q1o will state how the word q1r is logic.

Judging q1n involves how a state of q1s affects the ability to q1e and to q1r. If all goes well, you'll achieve q1o.
Judging q1n involves how a state of q1s affects the ability to q1e and to q1r. If all goes well, you'll achieve q1o.