When arguing motive, the word chaos askes why the word urge is a mystery but, the word order will state how the word resolve is logic.
When arguing Dickensian disparity, the word foolishness askes why the word best is a mystery but, the word wisdom will state how the word worst is logic.
To urge is the disconnected potential of motive. To resolve is the connected actual of motive.
To best is the disconnected potential of Dickensian disparity. To worst is the connected actual of Dickensian disparity.
When arguing motive, the word chaos askes why the word urge is a mystery but, the word order will state how the word resolve is logic.
When arguing Dickensian disparity, the word foolishness askes why the word best is a mystery but, the word wisdom will state how the word worst is logic.
To urge is the disconnected potential of motive. To resolve is the connected actual of motive.
To best is the disconnected potential of Dickensian disparity. To worst is the connected actual of Dickensian disparity.
When arguing q1n, the word q1s askes why the word q1e is a mystery but, the word q1o will state how the word q1r is logic.
When arguing q1n, the word q1s askes why the word q1e is a mystery but, the word q1o will state how the word q1r is logic.
To q1e is the disconnected potential of q1n. To q1r is the connected actual of q1n.
To q1e is the disconnected potential of q1n. To q1r is the connected actual of q1n.