When arguing epistemology, the word presuppositions askes why the word extent is a mystery but, the word knowledge will state how the word validity is logic.
When arguing energy, the word impetus askes why the word accelerate is a mystery but, the word transform will state how the word decay is logic.

When explaining epistemology, it may be that, presuppositions and extent are actually a single factor that contain the mutiple factors of knowledge and validity.
When explaining energy, it may be that, impetus and accelerate are actually a single factor that contain the mutiple factors of transform and decay.

When arguing q1n, the word q1s askes why the word q1e is a mystery but, the word q1o will state how the word q1r is logic.
When arguing q1n, the word q1s askes why the word q1e is a mystery but, the word q1o will state how the word q1r is logic.

When explaining q1n, it may be that, q1s and q1e are actually a single factor that contain the mutiple factors of q1o and q1r.
When explaining q1n, it may be that, q1s and q1e are actually a single factor that contain the mutiple factors of q1o and q1r.