You may try to best the Dickensian disparity that can worst, or worst the Dickensian disparity that can best.
You may try to far the distance that can near, or near the distance that can far.

When explaining Dickensian disparity, it may be that, foolishness and best are actually a single factor that contain the mutiple factors of wisdom and worst.
When explaining distance, it may be that, position and far are actually a single factor that contain the mutiple factors of relation and near.

You may try to q1e the q1n that can q1r, or q1r the q1n that can q1e.
You may try to q1e the q1n that can q1r, or q1r the q1n that can q1e.

When explaining q1n, it may be that, q1s and q1e are actually a single factor that contain the mutiple factors of q1o and q1r.
When explaining q1n, it may be that, q1s and q1e are actually a single factor that contain the mutiple factors of q1o and q1r.