Polynym Math

set comparison between two polynyms

PObservation Bias ⊥ Pman


Equality

$$A \neq B$$
A is not equal to B

Subset

$$A \not\subseteq B$$
A is not a subset of or equal to B

Superset

$$A \not\supseteq B$$
A is not a superset of or equal to B

Intersection

$$A \cap B =$$
{ }

Union

$$A \cup B =$$
{ Confirmation bias, Processing bias, called, common, holy sage, superior, worthy }

Symmetric Difference

$$A \ominus B =$$
{ Confirmation bias, Processing bias, called, common, holy sage, superior, worthy }

Difference

$$A - B =$$
{ Confirmation bias, Processing bias }

Difference

$$B - A =$$
{ called, common, holy sage, superior, worthy }

Cartesian Product

$$A \times B =$$
{ (Confirmation bias, called),
(Confirmation bias, common),
(Confirmation bias, holy sage),
(Confirmation bias, superior),
(Confirmation bias, worthy),
(Processing bias, called),
(Processing bias, common),
(Processing bias, holy sage),
(Processing bias, superior),
(Processing bias, worthy) }
Polynym
Observation

Observation Bias

Source
Traditional
Area
Scientific Research
Mode
type
Depth
2
User
dane


vs.

man

Source
Hsing
Area
Metaphysics
Mode
type
Depth
5
User
scotty
2 types of Observation Bias

5 types of man
Confirmation bias
Processing bias

common
worthy
superior
called
holy sage
© 2026 Nymology