Polynym Math

set comparison between two polynyms

PComponents of Attitude ⊥ Pexplanation


Equality

$$A \neq B$$
A is not equal to B

Subset

$$A \not\subseteq B$$
A is not a subset of or equal to B

Superset

$$A \not\supseteq B$$
A is not a superset of or equal to B

Intersection

$$A \cap B =$$
{ }

Union

$$A \cup B =$$
{ affective (feelings), becoming, being, cognitive (beliefs), conative (behavior), knowing, willing }

Symmetric Difference

$$A \ominus B =$$
{ affective (feelings), becoming, being, cognitive (beliefs), conative (behavior), knowing, willing }

Difference

$$A - B =$$
{ affective (feelings), cognitive (beliefs), conative (behavior) }

Difference

$$B - A =$$
{ becoming, being, knowing, willing }

Cartesian Product

$$A \times B =$$
{ (affective (feelings), becoming),
(affective (feelings), being),
(affective (feelings), knowing),
(affective (feelings), willing),
(cognitive (beliefs), becoming),
(cognitive (beliefs), being),
(cognitive (beliefs), knowing),
(cognitive (beliefs), willing),
(conative (behavior), becoming),
(conative (behavior), being),
(conative (behavior), knowing),
(conative (behavior), willing) }
Polynym

Components of Attitude

Source
Schiffman & Kanuk
Area
Social Psychology
Mode
part
Depth
3
User
dane


vs.

explanation

Source
Arthur Schopenhauer
Area
Philosophy
Mode
type
Depth
4
User
scotty
3 parts of Components of Attitude

4 types of explanation
cognitive (beliefs)
affective (feelings)
conative (behavior)

becoming
knowing
being
willing
© 2025 Nymology