Polynym Math

set comparison between two polynyms

Pgrammar ⊥ Pman


Equality

$$A \neq B$$
A is not equal to B

Subset

$$A \not\subseteq B$$
A is not a subset of or equal to B

Superset

$$A \not\supseteq B$$
A is not a superset of or equal to B

Intersection

$$A \cap B =$$
{ }

Union

$$A \cup B =$$
{ called, common, context-free, context-sensitive, holy sage, recursively enumerable, regular, superior, worthy }

Symmetric Difference

$$A \ominus B =$$
{ called, common, context-free, context-sensitive, holy sage, recursively enumerable, regular, superior, worthy }

Difference

$$A - B =$$
{ context-free, context-sensitive, recursively enumerable, regular }

Difference

$$B - A =$$
{ called, common, holy sage, superior, worthy }

Cartesian Product

$$A \times B =$$
{ (context-free, called),
(context-free, common),
(context-free, holy sage),
(context-free, superior),
(context-free, worthy),
(context-sensitive, called),
(context-sensitive, common),
(context-sensitive, holy sage),
(context-sensitive, superior),
(context-sensitive, worthy),
(recursively enumerable, called),
(recursively enumerable, common),
(recursively enumerable, holy sage),
(recursively enumerable, superior),
(recursively enumerable, worthy),
(regular, called),
(regular, common),
(regular, holy sage),
(regular, superior),
(regular, worthy) }

grammar

Source
Noam Chomsky
Area
Linguistics
Mode
type
Depth
4
User
scotty


vs.

man

Source
Hsing
Area
Metaphysics
Mode
type
Depth
5
User
scotty
4 types of grammar

5 types of man
recursively enumerable
context-sensitive
context-free
regular

common
worthy
superior
called
holy sage
© 2026 Nymology