Judging evidence involves how a state of anecdotal affects the ability to analogical and to statistical. If all goes well, you'll achieve testimonial.
Judging sooth-irritate involves how a state of source affects the ability to sooth and to irritate. If all goes well, you'll achieve target.

when relating to evidence, understanding statistical makes me think of testimonial, which allows analogical to make sense of anecdotal.
when relating to sooth-irritate, understanding irritate makes me think of target, which allows sooth to make sense of source.

Judging q1n involves how a state of q1s affects the ability to q1e and to q1r. If all goes well, you'll achieve q1o.
Judging q1n involves how a state of q1s affects the ability to q1e and to q1r. If all goes well, you'll achieve q1o.

when relating to q1n, understanding q1r makes me think of q1o, which allows q1e to make sense of q1s.
when relating to q1n, understanding q1r makes me think of q1o, which allows q1e to make sense of q1s.