When explaining valence, it may be that, feeling and attract are actually a single factor that contain the mutiple factors of object and avert.
When explaining industry comparison, it may be that, functional (do different?) and strategic (ideas to actions?) are actually a single factor that contain the mutiple factors of process (how to do better?) and data (how well?).
Attract stimulates ideas about object but needs to reference feeling if the topic is valence.
Strategic (ideas to actions?) stimulates ideas about process (how to do better?) but needs to reference functional (do different?) if the topic is industry comparison.
When explaining valence, it may be that, feeling and attract are actually a single factor that contain the mutiple factors of object and avert.
When explaining industry comparison, it may be that, functional (do different?) and strategic (ideas to actions?) are actually a single factor that contain the mutiple factors of process (how to do better?) and data (how well?).
Attract stimulates ideas about object but needs to reference feeling if the topic is valence.
Strategic (ideas to actions?) stimulates ideas about process (how to do better?) but needs to reference functional (do different?) if the topic is industry comparison.
When explaining q1n, it may be that, q1s and q1e are actually a single factor that contain the mutiple factors of q1o and q1r.
When explaining q1n, it may be that, q1s and q1e are actually a single factor that contain the mutiple factors of q1o and q1r.
q1e stimulates ideas about q1o but needs to reference q1s if the topic is q1n.
q1e stimulates ideas about q1o but needs to reference q1s if the topic is q1n.