When arguing door, the word passage askes why the word open is a mystery but, the word barrier will state how the word close is logic.
When arguing aroma, the word odor askes why the word smell is a mystery but, the word scent will state how the word stink is logic.
It was the open of times, it was the close of times, it was the age of barrier, it was the age of passage.
It was the smell of times, it was the stink of times, it was the age of scent, it was the age of odor.
When arguing door, the word passage askes why the word open is a mystery but, the word barrier will state how the word close is logic.
When arguing aroma, the word odor askes why the word smell is a mystery but, the word scent will state how the word stink is logic.
It was the open of times, it was the close of times, it was the age of barrier, it was the age of passage.
It was the smell of times, it was the stink of times, it was the age of scent, it was the age of odor.
When arguing q1n, the word q1s askes why the word q1e is a mystery but, the word q1o will state how the word q1r is logic.
When arguing q1n, the word q1s askes why the word q1e is a mystery but, the word q1o will state how the word q1r is logic.
It was the q1e of times, it was the q1r of times, it was the age of q1o, it was the age of q1s.
It was the q1e of times, it was the q1r of times, it was the age of q1o, it was the age of q1s.